Compute Availability Factor (CAF): A Framework for Measuring the Physical Deliverability of Artificial Intelligence Compute: From nominal accelerator capacity to effective and infrastructure-available compute

Q: What is the Compute Availability Factor (CAF)?

The Compute Availability Factor (CAF) is an empirical measurement framework developed by Richie Adomako at Serpens Inc. (ResearchGate Publication ID 414150400) that quantifies the fraction of hardware-effective AI compute that can actually be delivered in the physical world under real electrical (E), thermal (T), network (N), and operational (O) infrastructure constraints: CAF(t) = E(t) × T(t) × N(t) × O(t).

Q: What is the relationship between the CAF website, CAF Watcher, and the CAF Research Paper?

CAF is the formal mathematical methodology and research specification ('Compute Availability Factor: A Framework for Measuring the Physical Deliverability of Artificial Intelligence Compute', Adomako, 2026) rooted in the thesis 'When the Building Becomes the Computer'. This site hosts both the formal specification and CAF Watcher—the operational observability platform, 3D Spatial Desktop OS, Cluster Physics Simulator, and Workload Constraint Investigator built on that methodology.

Q: How does CAF calculate Physically Deliverable Compute and the Deliverability Coverage Ratio (DCR)?

CAF first converts Nominal Compute (C_N, raw installed accelerators) into Hardware-Effective Compute (C_E = C_N × U_H). It then multiplies by CAF = E × T × N × O to derive Physically Deliverable Compute (C_D = C_N × U_H × CAF). The Deliverability Coverage Ratio (DCR = C_D / C_R) compares verified deliverable compute against roadmap required compute (C_R) using continuous interval bounds [Lower, Upper].

Q: How does CAF handle missing or unverified public infrastructure data?

CAF enforces the epistemic axiom that 'Unknown does not equal Unavailable'. Missing public evidence is never treated as zero capacity; instead, it is classified as UNKNOWN, widens the [Lower, Upper] availability interval, and reduces the separate Evidence Confidence score (Q).

Adomako, Richie

↳ CAF WATCHER // CONTINUOUS PHYSICAL AUDIT LEDGER

ASML (EUV & High-NA Lithography Chokepoint) Grade A+

The absolute physical bedrock of global computing: Twinscan High-NA EUV lithography systems and precision optics · Category: Hardware & Physical Substrate

Executive Physical Feasibility & Delivery Audit

Institutional Baseline: Evaluated under the Compute Availability Factor (CAF v1.0) specification by Richie Adomako (Serpens Inc., ResearchGate ID 414150400). CAF evaluates stated accelerator capabilities against empirical physical reality (interconnection queues, electrical substations, liquid cooling heat transfer, and optical network fabrics). Missing public evidence is classified as unknown—it is never treated as zero capacity.

CAF INTERVAL
[0.61 – 0.94]
DELIVERY GAP SCORE
18 pts
OPERATING POWER
0.4 GW
vs 0.1 GW announced
EVIDENCE CONFIDENCE
MEDIUM (65%)

Physical Coupling Pillars (E, T, N, O)

Power & Grid Substrate (E = [object Object]): 94/100. Direct connection to Dutch TenneT high-voltage transmission lines and on-site high-capacity transformer substations supporting industrial cleanrooms and 20kW+ laser test bays.
Thermal Dissipation & CDU Limits (T = [object Object]): 98/100. Maintains the most stringent thermal and acoustic micro-tolerances in human industry: cleanroom air temperature held within fractions of a millikelvin to prevent thermal expansion of wafer stages.
Cluster Topology & Optical Fabric (N = [object Object]): 96/100. Cleanrooms sit on concrete foundation slabs driven dozens of meters into Dutch bedrock, isolated from surrounding highway vibrations by pneumatic dampers.
Silicon & Operational Availability (O = [object Object]): 98/100. Without ASML scanners, no CoWoS interposer, no HBM3e/HBM4 micro-bumps, and no 3nm/2nm logic chips can be printed anywhere in the world.